ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on Detection Methods for Gas Pipeline Networks Under Small-Hole Leakage Conditions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A pipeline leakage detection method for boiler energy operation system using enhanced SVM-based acoustic emission technology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gas pipeline networks are vital urban infrastructure, susceptible to leaks caused by natural disasters and adverse weather, posing significant safety risks. Detecting and localizing these leaks is crucial for mitigating hazards. However, existing methods often fail to effectively model the time-varying structural data of pipelines, limiting their detection capabilities. This study introduces a novel approach for leak detection using a spatial-temporal attention network (STAN) tailored for small-hole leakage conditions. A graph attention network (GAT) is first used to model the spatial dependencies between sensors, capturing the dynamic patterns of adjacent nodes. An LSTM model is then employed for encoding and decoding time series data, incorporating a temporal attention mechanism to capture evolving changes over time, thus improving detection accuracy. The proposed model is evaluated using Pipeline Studio software and compared with state-of-the-art models on a gas pipeline simulation dataset. Results demonstrate competitive precision (91.7%), recall (96.5%), and F1-score (0.94). Furthermore, the method effectively identifies sensor statuses and temporal dynamics, reducing leakage risks and enhancing model performance. This study highlights the potential of deep learning techniques in addressing the challenges of leak detection and emphasizes the effectiveness of spatial-temporal modeling for improved detection accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.