Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943358›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Classification of Flying Drones Using Millimeter-Wave Radar: Comparative Analysis of Algorithms Under Noisy Conditions.

Mauro Larrat, Claudomiro Sales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mauro LarratInstituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa, 01 Guamá, CEP, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-4963-4625
Claudomiro SalesInstituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa, 01 Guamá, CEP, Belém 66075-110, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2735-1383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates different machine learning algorithms in detecting and identifying drones using radar data from a 60 GHz millimeter-wave sensor. These signals were collected from a bionic bird and two drones, namely DJI Mavic and DJI Phantom 3 Pro, which were represented in complex form to preserve amplitude and phase information. The first benchmarks used four algorithms, namely long short-term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), one-dimensional convolutional neural network (Conv1D), and Transformer, and they were benchmarked for robustness under noisy conditions, including artificial noise types like white noise, Pareto noise, impulsive noise, and multipath interference. As expected, Transformer outperformed other algorithms in terms of accuracy, even on noisy data; however, in certain noise contexts, particularly Pareto noise, it showed weaknesses. For this purpose, we propose Multimodal Transformer, which incorporates more statistical features-skewness and kurtosis-in addition to amplitude and phase data. This resulted in a improvement in detection accuracy, even under difficult noise conditions. Our results demonstrate the importance of noise in processing radar signals and the benefits afforded by a multimodal presentation of data in detecting unmanned aerial vehicle and birds. This study sets up a benchmark for state-of-the-art machine learning methodologies for radar-based detection systems, providing valuable insight into methods of increasing the robustness of algorithms to environmental noise.

Indexed as

drone detectionmachine learningmillimeter-wave radar sensor

Identifiers

PMID39943358
PMCPMC11821064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.