Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943350›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Review of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping for the Robotic-Based Nondestructive Evaluation of Infrastructures.

Ali Ghadimzadeh Alamdari, Farzad Azizi Zade, Arvin Ebrahimkhanlou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali Ghadimzadeh AlamdariDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics (MEM), Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-6881-2297
Farzad Azizi ZadeMechanical Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948944, Iran.ORCID 0009-0007-6510-8919
Arvin EbrahimkhanlouDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics (MEM), Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0740-5807

Funding

The Carleone Faculty Award of the College of Engineering at Drexel University N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maturity of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) methods has now reached a significant level that motivates in-depth and problem-specific reviews. The focus of this study is to investigate the evolution of vision-based, LiDAR-based, and a combination of these methods and evaluate their performance in enclosed and GPS-denied (EGD) conditions for infrastructure inspection. This paper categorizes and analyzes the SLAM methods in detail, considering the sensor fusion type and chronological order. The paper analyzes the performance of eleven open-source SLAM solutions, containing two visual (VINS-Mono, ORB-SLAM 2), eight LiDAR-based (LIO-SAM, Fast-LIO 2, SC-Fast-LIO 2, LeGO-LOAM, SC-LeGO-LOAM A-LOAM, LINS, F-LOAM) and one combination of the LiDAR and vision-based method (LVI-SAM). The benchmarking section analyzes accuracy and computational resource consumption using our collected dataset and a test dataset. According to the results, LiDAR-based methods performed well under EGD conditions. Contrary to common presumptions, some vision-based methods demonstrate acceptable performance in EGD environments. Additionally, combining vision-based techniques with LiDAR-based methods demonstrates superior performance compared to either vision-based or LiDAR-based methods individually.

Indexed as

benchmarkingGPS-deniedinfrastructureLiDAR-basedLiDAR-visual-inertiallocalizationrobotic inspectionSLAMvision-based

Identifiers

PMID39943350
PMCPMC11820643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.