ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Review of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping for the Robotic-Based Nondestructive Evaluation of Infrastructures.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indirect Vision-Based Localization of Cutter Bolts for Shield Machine Cutter Changing Robots.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Two-Step Filtering Approach for Indoor LiDAR Point Clouds: Efficient Removal of Jump Points and Misdetected Points.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of LiDAR-SLAM Systems: A Study of a Motorized Optomechanical LiDAR and an MEMS Scanner LiDAR.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Multi-Sensor Fusion-Based Localization Method for a Magnetic Adhesion Wall-Climbing Robot.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Semantic Fusion Algorithm of 2D LiDAR and Camera Based on Contour and Inverse Projection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The maturity of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) methods has now reached a significant level that motivates in-depth and problem-specific reviews. The focus of this study is to investigate the evolution of vision-based, LiDAR-based, and a combination of these methods and evaluate their performance in enclosed and GPS-denied (EGD) conditions for infrastructure inspection. This paper categorizes and analyzes the SLAM methods in detail, considering the sensor fusion type and chronological order. The paper analyzes the performance of eleven open-source SLAM solutions, containing two visual (VINS-Mono, ORB-SLAM 2), eight LiDAR-based (LIO-SAM, Fast-LIO 2, SC-Fast-LIO 2, LeGO-LOAM, SC-LeGO-LOAM A-LOAM, LINS, F-LOAM) and one combination of the LiDAR and vision-based method (LVI-SAM). The benchmarking section analyzes accuracy and computational resource consumption using our collected dataset and a test dataset. According to the results, LiDAR-based methods performed well under EGD conditions. Contrary to common presumptions, some vision-based methods demonstrate acceptable performance in EGD environments. Additionally, combining vision-based techniques with LiDAR-based methods demonstrates superior performance compared to either vision-based or LiDAR-based methods individually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.