SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning-Based Resource Management in Fog Computing: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resting-state fMRI-based machine learning for predicting SSRI treatment response in major depressive disorder.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- A hybrid RL-GA-LSTM-AE framework for energy-aware and SLA-driven task scheduling in cloud computing environments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sensor Driven Resource Optimization Framework for Intelligent Fog Enabled IoHT Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adaptive Reinforcement Learning-Based Framework for Energy-Efficient Task Offloading in a Fog-Cloud Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Decentralized adaptive task allocation for dynamic multi-agent systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic literature review analyzes machine learning (ML)-based techniques for resource management in fog computing. Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, this paper focuses on ML and deep learning (DL) solutions. Resource management in the fog computing domain was thoroughly analyzed by identifying the key factors and constraints. A total of 68 research papers of extended versions were finally selected and included in this study. The findings highlight a strong preference for DL in addressing resource management challenges within a fog computing paradigm, i.e., 66% of the reviewed articles leveraged DL techniques, while 34% utilized ML. Key factors such as latency, energy consumption, task scheduling, and QoS are interconnected and critical for resource management optimization. The analysis reveals that latency, energy consumption, and QoS are the prime factors addressed in the literature on ML-based fog computing resource management. Latency is the most frequently addressed parameter, investigated in 77% of the articles, followed by energy consumption and task scheduling at 44% and 33%, respectively. Furthermore, according to our evaluation, an extensive range of challenges, i.e., computational resource and latency, scalability and management, data availability and quality, and model complexity and interpretability, are addressed by employing 73, 53, 45, and 46 ML/DL techniques, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.