Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943326›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine Learning-Based Resource Management in Fog Computing: A Systematic Literature Review.

Fahim Ullah Khan, Ibrar Ali Shah, Sadaqat Jan, Shabir Ahmad, Taegkeun Whangbo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fahim Ullah KhanDepartment of Computer Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Mardan 23200, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0005-3269-569X
Ibrar Ali ShahDepartment of Computer Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Mardan 23200, Pakistan.
Sadaqat JanDepartment of Computer Software Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Mardan 23200, Pakistan.
Shabir AhmadCenter of Artificial Intelligence for Medical Instruments, Incheon Metropolitan City 21982, Republic of Korea.
Taegkeun WhangboCenter of Artificial Intelligence for Medical Instruments, Incheon Metropolitan City 21982, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic literature review analyzes machine learning (ML)-based techniques for resource management in fog computing. Utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, this paper focuses on ML and deep learning (DL) solutions. Resource management in the fog computing domain was thoroughly analyzed by identifying the key factors and constraints. A total of 68 research papers of extended versions were finally selected and included in this study. The findings highlight a strong preference for DL in addressing resource management challenges within a fog computing paradigm, i.e., 66% of the reviewed articles leveraged DL techniques, while 34% utilized ML. Key factors such as latency, energy consumption, task scheduling, and QoS are interconnected and critical for resource management optimization. The analysis reveals that latency, energy consumption, and QoS are the prime factors addressed in the literature on ML-based fog computing resource management. Latency is the most frequently addressed parameter, investigated in 77% of the articles, followed by energy consumption and task scheduling at 44% and 33%, respectively. Furthermore, according to our evaluation, an extensive range of challenges, i.e., computational resource and latency, scalability and management, data availability and quality, and model complexity and interpretability, are addressed by employing 73, 53, 45, and 46 ML/DL techniques, respectively.

Indexed as

Cloud ComputingMachine LearningDeep LearningHumanscloud computingdeep learning (DL)edge computingInternet of Things (IoT)interpretabilitylatencymachine learning (ML)resource managementscalability

Identifiers

PMID39943326
PMCPMC11820886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.