ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improving Stroke Treatment Using Magnetic Nanoparticle Sensors to Monitor Brain Thrombus Extraction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology for ischemic stroke treatment: addressing challenges across stroke management stages.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) successfully treats ischemic strokes by extracting the thrombus, or clot, using a stent retriever to pull it through the blood vessel. However, clot slippage and/or fragmentation can occur. Real-time feedback to a clinician about attachment between the stent and clot could enable more complete removal. We propose a system whereby antibody-targeted magnetic nanoparticles (NPs) are injected via a microcatheter to coat the clot, oscillating magnetic fields excite the particles, and a small coil attached to the catheter picks up a signal that determines the proximity of the clot to the stent. (2) Methods: We used existing simulation code to model the signal from NPs distributed on a hemispherical clot with three orthogonally applied magnetic fields. An in vitro apparatus was built that applied fields and read out signals from a 1.5 mm pickup coil at a variable distance and orientation angle from a sample of 100 nm iron oxide core/shell NPs. (3) Results: Our simulations suggest that the sum of the voltages induced in the pickup coil from three orthogonal applied fields could localize a clot to within 180 µm, regardless of the exact orientation of the pickup coil, with further precision added via rotation-correction formulae. Our experimental system validated simulations; we estimated an in vitro distance recovery precision of 41 µm with a pickup coil 1 mm from the clot. (4) Conclusions: Magnetic NP sensing could be a safe and real-time method to estimate whether a clot is attached to the stent retriever during MT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.