Observational studySensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improving Diagnostic Yield for Analyzing Periodic Electrograms in the Remote Detection of Pacemaker Lead Issues.
Observational study in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Center Trained Residual Neural Network for Robust Classification of Atrial High-Rate Episodes in Remotely Monitored Pacemakers and Defibrillators.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Intracardiac Electrogram Interpretation: A New Frontier in Cardiac Diagnostics for Pacemaker Patients.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remote monitoring of pacemakers decreases patient complications and reduces public health expenses. The transmission of passive real-time electrograms (EGM) has been shown to increase the diagnostic yield, but this may add to the work burden. Passive EGMs provide snapshots without adjustments, while active EGMs modify pacemaker settings temporarily to encourage sensing and pacing, potentially revealing issues such as undersensing, oversensing, or loss of capture. The added value of active EGMs compared to the passive EGM remains to be shown. The objective of this multicenter observational study is to evaluate, in a large population of patients implanted with a pacemaker capable of transmitting both passive and active periodic EGMs, the added benefit of active periodic EGMs on diagnostic yield of pacemaker-related anomalies. In a retrospective analysis of 7068 EGMs from 2733 patients, active modes detected significantly more anomalies (6.7%) than passive alone (3.3%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.