Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943283›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Complete Pipeline to Extract Temperature from Thermal Images of Pigs.

Rodania Bekhit, Inonge Reimert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rodania BekhitAdaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Inonge ReimertAdaptation Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3610-5037

Funding

Wageningen University & Research Animal Sciences program Next Level Animal Sciences (NLAS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using deep learning or artificial intelligence (AI) in research with animals is a new interdisciplinary area of research. In this study, we have explored the potential of thermal imaging and AI in pig research. Thermal cameras play a vital role in obtaining and collecting a large amount of data, and AI has the capabilities of processing and extracting valuable information from these data. The amount of data collected using thermal imaging is huge, and automation techniques are therefore crucial to find a meaningful interpretation of the changes in temperature. In this paper, we present a complete pipeline to extract temperature automatically from a selected Region of Interest (ROI). This system consists of three stages: the first one checks whether the ROI is completely visible to observe the thermal temperature, and then the second stage uses an encoder-decoder structure of a convolution neural network to segment the ROI, if the condition was met at stage one. In the last stage, the maximum temperature is extracted and saved in an external file. The segmentation model showed good performance, with a mean Pixel Class accuracy of 92.3%, and a mean Intersection over Union of 87.1%. The extracted temperature observed by the model entirely matched the manually observed temperature. The system showed reliable results to be used independently without human intervention to determine the temperature in the selected ROI in pigs.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedThermographyAlgorithmsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerSwineTemperatureclassification modelsdeep learningpigssegmentation modelssensorsthermal imaging

Identifiers

PMID39943283
PMCPMC11821139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.