Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943244›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Permeability Sensors for Magnetic Steel Structural Health Monitoring.

Evangelos V Hristoforou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Evangelos V HristoforouLaboratory of Electronic Sensors, Zografou Campus, National Technical University of Athens, 15780 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1895-6417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, magnetic permeability sensors able to perform structural health monitoring of magnetic steels, by means of determining residual strain and stress amplitude and gradient distribution, responsible for crack initiation, are presented. The good agreement between magnetic properties and residual strains and stresses is illustrated first, resulting in the determination of the magnetic stress calibration (MASC) curves and the Universal MASC curve. Having determined differential magnetic permeability as a key magnetic property, able to measure and monitor residual strain and stress distribution in magnetic steels, the paper is devoted to the presentation of the permeability instruments and sensors developed in our lab. The classic single sheet testers and the electromagnetic yokes, are compared with new, low-power-consumption permeability sensors using the Hall effect and the anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) effect, discussing their advantages and disadvantages in magnetic steel structural health monitoring.

Indexed as

anisotropic magnetoresistancebarkhausen noisehall effectmagnetic steelsstructural health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39943244
PMCPMC11821167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.