Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943160›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Assessing Gender Equality in Italian Animal Science: A Case Study on Academic Careers and Research Outcomes.

Anna Sandrucci, Lucia Bailoni, Paola Crepaldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gender dynamics in Animal Science: progress, pitfalls, and pathways forward.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna SandrucciDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences- Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, University of Milan, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1014-0088
Lucia BailoniDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3027-2288
Paola CrepaldiDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences- Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, University of Milan, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6526-2162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper focuses on gender issues within the Italian Animal Science and Production Association (ASPA), which includes both academic and non-academic researchers involved in animal sciences. Data from the association's archives in 2023 and bibliometric data obtained from Scopus and Web of Science were used. This study highlighted how within the ASPA and in that part of the academic realm falling within the field of animal science, a noticeable gender gap still exists, albeit decreasing over time at a very slow pace. There is clear vertical segregation, with a minority of women occupying full professor positions, and horizontal segregation with a low percentage of women involved in animal science disciplines closer to STEM fields, such as "Animal breeding and genetics". At the bibliometric level, gender differences in bibliometric indicators are observed, favouring men, although these differences are not significant when considering the academic position, scientific sector, and age. In the official journal of the ASPA (

Indexed as

academic careersauthorshipbibliometricsgender gapsegregation

Identifiers

PMID39943160
PMCPMC11816178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.