ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Translational Clinical Research: Use of Allogeneic Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) for Wound Regeneration in Two Small-Sized Dogs.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is a recent regenerative biomaterial applied in clinical wound healing. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic PRF therapy as a regenerative methodology for treating skin wounds in two small dogs. A Miniature Pinscher and a mixed breed dog weighing 3.6 and 9.5 kg, aged 5 and 10 years, with extensive skin wounds implicating significant tissue loss and with abundant yellow exudate were allocated to this study. Each allogenic PRF treatment was derived from screened donors and consisted of grafting PRFs at the wound recipient area. Nevertheless, the blood group of the donor or recipient was not considered. The wound from case 1 received three PRF treatments during the initial two weeks of treatment, and case 2 received four PRF treatments, followed by single weekly ones. The utilization of PRFs was suspended as soon as relevant wound contraction and epithelization were observed. Both animals received systemic antibiotics prescribed at the emergency room by the first clinician. The wounds were cleaned using sterile saline only. Two weeks later, the lesions had reduced by more than 80%. All lesions exhibited aesthetic and uneventful healing. No rejection, necrosis, or infection signs were observed. PRF acted as a regenerative biomaterial, forming vascularized granulation tissue, followed by epithelization and wound resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.