Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943129›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

An Investigation of Dairy Cattle Welfare in Commercial Iranian Farms: Results from Animal- and Stockperson-Based Measures.

Ali Jafari-Gh, Richard Laven, Fatima Khaloubagheri, Mohsen Haji Mirrahimi, Saeid Jafari-Gh, Mehdi Dehghan Banadaky, Kristina Ruth Mueller, Emilie Vallee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ali Jafari-GhSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, 4410 Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-7990
Richard LavenSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, 4410 Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8938-8595
Fatima KhaloubagheriIndependent Researcher, 4472 Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Mohsen Haji MirrahimiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Karaj Islamic Azad University, Karaj 3149968111, Iran.
Saeid Jafari-GhAnimal Science Department, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Karaj Islamic Azad University, Karaj 3149968111, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9920-6022
Mehdi Dehghan BanadakyAnimal Science Department, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj 3158777871, Iran.
Kristina Ruth MuellerSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, 4410 Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-5356
Emilie ValleeSchool of Veterinary Science, Massey University, 4410 Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3145-5468

Funding

Massey University RM24416-XXXX-AJAFA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dairy cow welfare can impact both the economic performance of an individual farm and the public perception of the sector, thus influencing the sustainability of the dairy farming industry. Intensive dairy farming in Iran started in the 1940s, but there is limited data available regarding dairy cattle welfare in the country. Therefore, the aim of this study was to design and use a comprehensive bespoke welfare assessment protocol in intensive Iranian dairy farms to provide baseline data for Iran and other countries with similar farming systems. The protocol consists of animal-based, stockperson-based, and resource-based measures. The first part of the welfare assessment protocol (being presented in this paper) was developed from the existing literature and contained 11 animal-based and 2 stockmanship measures. The protocol was applied in 62 intensive dairy cattle farms in five arid and semi-arid provinces of Iran. Welfare Quality sample size suggestions were used to reach the minimum sample size for all animal-based measures except for the locomotion score, where either the whole milking herd was scored or all cows in the early lactation (<150 days in milk) group. Results show that there was a good focus on nutrition management on the farms. Lameness prevalence and the incidence of hock lesions were too high, although within the range seen in many housed cows outside Iran. In addition, 13.5% of cows had damaged ears. The prevalence of dirty legs was high (≥80% of cows), and the hygiene score was unrelated to the farming system. Finally, the extremely high median prevalence of tail damage (60%) indicates a significant welfare issue that needs to be addressed with urgency.

Indexed as

animal welfarecow comfortear damagehock lesionslamenesstail damage

Identifiers

PMID39943129
PMCPMC11815728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.