Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39943075›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Boar Sperm Motility Assessment Using Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis: Current Practices, Limitations, and Methodological Challenges.

Lenka Hackerova, Aneta Pilsova, Zuzana Pilsova, Natalie Zelenkova, Pavla Tymich Hegrova, Barbora Klusackova, Eva Chmelikova, Marketa Sedmikova, Ondrej Simonik, Pavla Postlerova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Effect ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lenka HackerovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Aneta PilsovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana PilsovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Natalie ZelenkovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavla Tymich HegrovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Barbora KlusackovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6380-3287
Eva ChmelikovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
Marketa SedmikovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0947-4256
Ondrej SimonikLaboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, 25250 Vestec, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6577-765X
Pavla PostlerovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-4652

Funding

Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology RVO:86652036Czech Science Foundation GA22-31156SInternal Grant Agency of the Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague SV24-21-21230Ministry of Agriculture QK21010327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spermatozoa are highly specialized male cells that are characterized by a unique ability to move, which is a critical factor for successful fertilization. The relative simplicity of motility assessment, especially in livestock, has made it a widely used parameter for evaluating ejaculate quality or cryopreserved semen in the clinical field, and an advanced tool in reproductive physiology and toxicology research. Technological advances in image analysis and computational methods have substantially increased its accuracy through the use of computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) to minimize subjective bias in motility assessments. Nevertheless, this more objective method still presents some significant challenges, including variability in the sample preparation, imaging conditions, and analytical parameters. These issues contribute to inconsistency and impair the reproducibility and comparability of data between laboratories. The implementation of standardized protocols, combined with comprehensive training and rigorous evaluation, can serve to mitigate some of the emerging inconsistencies. In addition, the in vitro conditions under which CASA analyses are performed often differ significantly from the natural environment of the female reproductive tract in vivo. This review discusses the methodologies, critical issues, and limitations of sperm motility analyses using CASA, with a particular focus on the boar as an important agricultural and biomedical model species in which this system is widely used.

Indexed as

ejaculate qualityhyperactivationin vitro analysiskinematic parametersmale fertilityreproductive physiologyveterinary science

Identifiers

PMID39943075
PMCPMC11816302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.