ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Combined Use of Biostimulation and Deficit Irrigation Improved the Fruit Quality in Table Grape.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainable Foliar Applications to Improve Grapevine Responses to Drought, High Temperatures, and Salinity: Impacts on Physiology, Yields, and Berry Quality.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effects of four different biostimulation treatments-composed of microorganisms, seaweed, and plant extracts-on the yield and quality traits of table grapes. Those treatments are compared with an untreated control treatment and tested under two different irrigation schedules: (i) Farmer Irrigation (FI), according to farmer criteria, and (ii) a deficit irrigation program, Precision Irrigation (PI), irrigated as FI, except during the post-veraison period when a 10% soil water depletion was allowed to mitigate the lixiviation. The water inputs in the treatments under PI were reduced by 30% without affecting the total yield but still promoting harvest precocity-an effect that was enhanced by the biostimulated treatments. This deficit irrigation program also stimulated berry growth and a higher maturity index. The different biostimulation treatments led to an improvement in the physical and chemical quality traits of the grapes; under FI, they showed a bigger size and a greater weight than the non-biostimulated treatment, while under PI, they showed a higher soluble sugar concentration and maturity index. Regardless of the irrigation program, the commercial berry color proportion was increased in all the biostimulated treatments, reducing the percentage of green berries. The combined use of biostimulation and PI can promote more efficient and sustainable farming practices, promoting fruit yield precocity and quality of the grapevine in drought-prone regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.