ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Hyperspectral Imaging and Machine Learning for Huanglongbing Detection on Leaf-Symptoms.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Destructive Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Investigating the Association Between Citrus Huanglongbing and Chlorophyll Content Using Hyperspectral Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A study on an efficient citrus Huanglong disease detection algorithm based on three-channel aggregated attention.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Huanglongbing is one of the most destructive diseases of citrus worldwide. Infected trees die due to the absence of practical cures. Thus, the removal of HLB-infected trees is one of the principal HLB managements for the regulation of disease spread. Here, we propose a non-destructive HLB detection method based on hyperspectral leaf reflectance. In total, 72 hyperspectral leaf images were collected in an HLB-invaded citrus orchard in Thailand and each image was visually distinguished into either any HLB symptom appearance (symptomatic) or no symptoms (asymptomatic) on the leaf. Principal component analysis was applied on the hyperspectral data and revealed 16 key wavelengths at red-edge to near-infrared regions (715, 718, 721, 724, 727, 730, 733, 736, 930, 933, 936, 939, 942, 945, 957, and 997 nm) that were characteristically differentiated in the symptomatic group. Seven models learnt on the spectral data at these 16 wavelengths were examined for the potential to separate these two image groups: random forest, decision tree, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting, logistic regression, linear discriminant. F1-score was employed to select the best-fit model to distinguish the two categories: random forest achieved the best score of 99.8%, followed by decision tree and k-nearest neighbor. The reliability of the visual grouping was evaluated by nearest neighbor matching and permutation test. These three models separated the two image categories as precisely as PCR results, indicating their potential as alternative tool instead of PCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.