Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39942918›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Rice Quality Storage Stability: From Variety Screening to Trait Identification.

Jinyu Tian, Guangmei Ji, Jiafeng Zhang, Danqiu Luo, Fang Zhang, Lijiang Li, Mingjin Jiang, Dawei Zhu, Min Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Study on the Application of COFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jinyu TianRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2610-1307
Guangmei JiRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Jiafeng ZhangRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Danqiu LuoRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Fang ZhangRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Lijiang LiRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Mingjin JiangRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.
Dawei ZhuRice Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Center, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China.
Min LiRice Research Institute of Guizhou Province, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550025, China.

Funding

the Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects QKHJC[2024]youth075the High-level Innovative Talent Project of Guizhou Province GCC[2023]065the Science and Technology Fund Project of Guizhou Province ZK2022-285the Youth Fund Project of Guizhou Rice Research Institute QSDSQN[2021]006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice, a staple global food crop, requires the maintenance of its quality stability during storage. This study aimed to screen rice varieties with high storage stability and elucidate their traits. Thirty-four widely cultivated varieties were selected to examine the changes in grain quality after one-year natural storage. The normalization method, hierarchical analysis, and cluster analysis were used to identify rice varieties maintaining their grain quality during storage. Meanwhile, the yield and its components, panicle traits, grain size, grain major component content, physiological indicators (such as antioxidant enzyme activity), and key growth stages were analyzed at rice maturity. The results showed that the processing, appearance, and eating quality of rice declined after storage. Specifically, the chalkiness degree increased significantly by 32.4%, while the cooked rice appearance, texture, and taste quality decreased significantly by 18.7%, 19.1%, and 14.2%, respectively. The grain quality storage stability was evaluated using a hierarchical analysis method based on the storage stability scores of the brown rice rate, milled rice rate, head milled rice rate, chalkiness degree, cooked rice appearance, cooked rice texture, and cooked rice taste. A judgment matrix was established, determining their corresponding weights of 0.0149, 0.0369, 0.0910, 0.286, 0.060, 0.148, and 0.364, respectively. Based on cluster analysis and the normalization method, these varieties were classified into three categories: high storage stability, intermediate storage stability, and low storage stability, accounting for 26.5%, 52.9%, and 20.6%, respectively. Finally, nine rice varieties with high storage stability were screened. The validation results of the principal component analysis also indicated the reliability of this result. Correlation analysis revealed that the storage stability of the rice grain quality was significantly and negatively correlated with the amylose starch content and malondialdehyde content. The average value and median value of the amylose starch content in high-storage-stability varieties are 10.7% and 6.99% lower than those in sensitive varieties, respectively. Therefore, the major feature of rice varieties with high storage stability is a low amylose starch content. This study provides valuable theoretical insights into the safe storage of rice grains and the selection and breeding of rice varieties with high storage stability.

Indexed as

characterization analysisgrain qualityricestorage stabilityvariety screening

Identifiers

PMID39942918
PMCPMC11820699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.