Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39942913›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Seed Survival in Silage: Reviewing 90 Years of Research.

Juliane Hahn, Jürgen Müller, Monika Heiermann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juliane HahnDepartment Technology Assessment, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), 14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2393-0852
Jürgen MüllerGrassland and Forage Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1204-4273
Monika HeiermannDepartment Technology Assessment, Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), 14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-2734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservation of biomasses through ensiling has a long history, and its sustainability has many aspects. One that is rarely considered is that the seeds of a wide variety of plants can enter the ensiling process with the plant biomass. This concise review provides an overview of the probability of seed survival in various types of silage since the 1930s. All data extracted from the reviewed studies are made available in a repository. The key finding from the 90 years of research is that ensiling can reduce the viability of plant seeds, but the seeds of some plant species can survive ensiling. Thus, silage production is both (1) a potential tool to ensure the sustainable, i.e., weed-free, use of plant biomass in agricultural production, including animal production chains, and (2) a potential gateway for weed spread, especially with regard to the closed material loops in circular bioeconomy approaches. The search for seed-borne factors and ensiling conditions that promote seed survival or killing is still ongoing and should be the subject of future research.

Indexed as

biomasscircular bioeconomyensiling conditionsfeedstockhardseedednessphysical dormancyseed viabilitysustainabilityweed management

Identifiers

PMID39942913
PMCPMC11820752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.