ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Chiral Separation of Mandelic Acid Derivatives Using Various Permethylated Cyclodextrin Selectors Containing Stationary Phases in GC.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Derivatization-Assisted Lipase-Mediated Separation of Optically Pure α-Cyclopentylmandelic Acid Through Enhanced Substrate Recognition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A good chiral separation usually results in a trial-and-error process; however, through systematic studies, certain principles can be established to correlate structure with chiral selectivity. These principles can then be applied to other chiral separations, reducing the time of developing chiral selective analytical methods. Using the model compounds, the established principles can be applied to a wider range of compounds. In this study, mandelic acid and its substituted derivatives were selected as model compounds to establish transferable rules. The chiral selectivity of 13 compounds was measured on various permethylated cyclodextrin selectors. Comparing the chiral selectivity of permethylated cyclodextrins with different ring sizes (α, β, and γ) provides further insight into the role of inclusion in the chiral selectivity of the cyclodextrin-based stationary phases. Different derivatives of acidic and hydroxyl functions of mandelic acids were tested. Ring- and alkyl-substituted mandelic acid enantiomeric pairs were also tested. By using these compounds, the role of hydrogen donor-acceptor interactions and dipole-dipole interactions and inclusions in chiral recognition processes were investigated. The chiral selectivity values were measured and extrapolated to the same temperature, for the sake of the comparison. Several general tendencies were concluded, which can be used for chiral separation of other enantiomer pairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.