ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Surface Quality and Compressive Properties of Mortise and Tenon Lattice Structures Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the anisotropy of mechanical properties and the challenge of removing support materials in lattice structures fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM), this study is inspired by traditional woodworking mortise and tenon joints. A hexagonal interlocking mortise lattice structure was designed, and mortise and tenon lattice structures (MTLSs) with various parameters were fabricated. Compared with the traditional integrated forming lattice structure (IFLS), the MTLS exhibits maximum reductions in side surface roughness (Ra), printing time, and material consumption of 74.87%, 25.55%, and 52.21%, respectively. In addition to enhancing surface quality and printing efficiency, the MTLS also exhibited superior mechanical properties. The uniaxial compression test results show that the specific strength, energy absorption (EA), and specific energy absorption (SEA) of the MTLS exhibit maximum increases of 51.22%, 894.59%, and 888.39%, respectively, compared with the IFLS. Moreover, the effects of strut angle and thickness on the lattice structure were analyzed. Smaller strut angles and larger strut thicknesses endowed greater strength, while smaller angles contributed to higher energy absorption. This study proposes a novel approach for designing lattice structures in additive manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.