ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Efficient Recycling Processes for Lithium-Ion Batteries.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Li-Mn-O Cathode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries: Synthesis, Structure Instability, Characterizations, and Stabilization Strategies.ChemSusChem · 2026Review
- A Critical Appraisal of Pyrolysis Pretreatment in Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling: From High-Temperature Material Transformations to Environmental Impact.ChemSusChem · 2026Article
- Eco-friendly approach for the effective leaching of valuable metals (Ni, Co, Mn) from spent lithium-ion batteries employing natural reductants.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Sustainable leaching of mixed LIB waste cathode employing a deep eutectic solvent composed of l-proline and lactic acid.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Fascinating Frontier, Nanoarchitectonics, as Method for Everything in Materials Science.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Modeling, Simulation, and Techno-Economic Assessment of a Spent Li-Ion Battery Recycling Plant.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are an indispensable power source for electric vehicles, portable electronics, and renewable energy storage systems due to their high energy density and long cycle life. However, the exponential growth in production and usage has necessitated highly effective recycling of end-of-life LIBs to recover valuable resources and minimize the environmental impact. Pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes are the most common recycling methods but pose considerable difficulties. The energy-intensive pyrometallurgical recycling process results in the loss of critical materials such as lithium and suffers from substantial emissions and high costs. Solvent extraction, a hydrometallurgical method, offers energy-efficient recovery for lithium, cobalt, and nickel but requires hazardous chemicals and careful waste management. Direct recycling is an alternative to traditional methods as it preserves the cathode active material (CAM) structure for quicker and cheaper regeneration. It also offers environmental advantages of lower energy intensity and chemical use. Hybrid pathways, combining hydrometallurgical and direct recycling methods, provide a cost-effective, scalable solution for LIB recycling, maximizing material recovery with minimal waste and environmental risk. The success of recycling methods depends on factors such as battery chemistry, the scalability of recovery processes, and the cost-effectiveness of waste material recovery. Though pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes have secured their position in LIB recycling, research is proceeding toward newer approaches, such as direct and hybrid methods. These alternatives are more efficient both environmentally and in terms of cost with a broader perspective into the future. In this review, we describe the current state of direct recycling as an alternative to traditional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical methods for recuperating these critical materials, particularly lithium. We also highlight some significant advancements that make these objectives possible. As research progresses, direct recycling and its variations hold great potential to reshape the way LIBs are recycled, providing a sustainable pathway for battery material recovery and reuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.