Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39942279›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Efficient Recycling Processes for Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Sabyasachi Paul, Pranav Shrotriya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sabyasachi PaulMechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8088-7865
Pranav ShrotriyaMechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9263-4892

Funding

Iowa Energy Center 22-IEC-002Iowa State University Manorama and Shyam Bahadur Professorship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are an indispensable power source for electric vehicles, portable electronics, and renewable energy storage systems due to their high energy density and long cycle life. However, the exponential growth in production and usage has necessitated highly effective recycling of end-of-life LIBs to recover valuable resources and minimize the environmental impact. Pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes are the most common recycling methods but pose considerable difficulties. The energy-intensive pyrometallurgical recycling process results in the loss of critical materials such as lithium and suffers from substantial emissions and high costs. Solvent extraction, a hydrometallurgical method, offers energy-efficient recovery for lithium, cobalt, and nickel but requires hazardous chemicals and careful waste management. Direct recycling is an alternative to traditional methods as it preserves the cathode active material (CAM) structure for quicker and cheaper regeneration. It also offers environmental advantages of lower energy intensity and chemical use. Hybrid pathways, combining hydrometallurgical and direct recycling methods, provide a cost-effective, scalable solution for LIB recycling, maximizing material recovery with minimal waste and environmental risk. The success of recycling methods depends on factors such as battery chemistry, the scalability of recovery processes, and the cost-effectiveness of waste material recovery. Though pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical processes have secured their position in LIB recycling, research is proceeding toward newer approaches, such as direct and hybrid methods. These alternatives are more efficient both environmentally and in terms of cost with a broader perspective into the future. In this review, we describe the current state of direct recycling as an alternative to traditional pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical methods for recuperating these critical materials, particularly lithium. We also highlight some significant advancements that make these objectives possible. As research progresses, direct recycling and its variations hold great potential to reshape the way LIBs are recycled, providing a sustainable pathway for battery material recovery and reuse.

Indexed as

battery recyclingdirect recyclingregenerationresynthesisspent Li-ion battery

Identifiers

PMID39942279
PMCPMC11818314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.