Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39942273›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Bibliometric and Systematic Review of the Use of Recycled Composite Materials with an Emphasis on the Mechanical Performance of Structures.

Cristina Veres, Maria Tănase

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristina VeresDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu-Mures, Nicolae Iorga Street, 1, 540088 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1057-808X
Maria TănaseMechanical Engineering Department, Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti, 100680 Ploiesti, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-6554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper provides a bibliometric and systematic review of the utilization of recycled composite materials, focusing on their mechanical performance in structural applications. Analyzing 1525 publications from the Web of Science database using VOSviewer, the study identifies trends, key topics, and collaboration networks. Findings show that recycled fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) maintain up to 93% of their virgin tensile strength under optimal pyrolysis conditions, while mechanical recycling can reduce tensile properties by up to 29%. Advances in hybrid composites and recycling technologies have facilitated sustainable applications in the construction, transportation, and energy sectors. China is a dominant contributor to research on recycled composites, with the USA making strong contributions as well. Other countries, including England, India, and Germany, have active research communities, while nations such as Saudi Arabia, the Republic of Korea, and Spain demonstrate growing global participation in this field. The bibliometric analysis highlights a significant increase in global research activity, with key trends focusing on additive manufacturing, circular economy practices, and sustainability. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, including high operational costs and variability in recycled material quality. This review underscores the need for standardized protocols and improved lifecycle assessments to accelerate the adoption of recycled composites in engineering practices.

Indexed as

advanced recycling technologiesbibliometric analysiscomposite materialsfiber-reinforced polymershybrid compositesmechanical propertiesrecycledVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID39942273
PMCPMC11818260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.