Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39942255›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Durable Structural Recycled Concrete for Different Exposure Environments.

Carla Vintimilla, Miren Etxeberria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recycled Aggregate: A Solution to Sustainable Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carla VintimillaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Campus Nord, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya·Barcelona TECH, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7689-2824
Miren EtxeberriaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Campus Nord, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya·Barcelona TECH, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-6207

Funding

Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca 2020 FISDU 00576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, the influence of limited percentages of coarse (CRCA) and fine (FRCA) recycled concrete aggregates (Type A recycled aggregates) on the durability properties of structural concrete was analyzed. Concretes were designed using 50% and 60% CRCA with simultaneous additions of 0%, 10%, and 20% FRCA and different types of cement (CEM II/AL 42.5 R, CEM II/AS 42.5 N/SRC, and CEM III/B 42.5 N-LH/SR). Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) and natural aggregate concrete (NAC) mixtures were produced with similar compressive strength using effective water-cement ratios of 0.47 and 0.5. The drying shrinkage values and durability properties were determined, and they included the chloride permeability, chloride penetration depth, and accelerated and natural carbonation rates. The findings revealed that RAC produced using CEM III/B, which included the mixture produced with 60% coarse RCA and 20% fine RCA, achieved low chloride ion penetrability (up to 850 Coulombs) and exhibited the lowest chloride diffusion coefficient, approximately 7 × 10

Indexed as

cement types (CEM II/AL, CEM II/AS, CEM III/B)chloride diffusionchloride permeabilitycoarse and fine aggregatesnatural and accelerated carbonationsupplementary cementitious materials

Identifiers

PMID39942255
PMCPMC11818246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.