ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Interfacial Shear Fracture Behavior of C18150Cu/1060Al/C18150Cu Trilayered Composite at Different Temperatures.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of Microstructure and Pore Formation Mechanism in Magnetic Pulse-Assisted Semi-Solid Brazed Joints of Cu/Al Tubes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interfacial shear fracture behavior of C18150Cu/1060Al/C18150Cu trilayered composite at different temperatures, which was fabricated by high-temperature oxygen-free hot rolling technology. The interfacial microstructure, interfacial shear strength, interfacial shear fracture morphology, and microstructure near the shear fracture were systematically investigated. The results reveal that the composite exhibits a metallurgical and mechanical bonding interface, along with mechanical interlocking between the copper and aluminum. As the testing temperature increases, the interfacial shear strength decreases. At temperatures below 150 °C, the strength remains stable, but it sharply decreases at temperatures above 150 °C. Specifically, the interfacial shear strength is 56.8 MPa at room temperature and 20.9 MPa at 350 °C. When the testing temperature is below 100 °C, the interfacial shear fracture predominantly occurs at the interface between the copper alloy and intermetallics. Also, aluminum is attached to the copper surface of the shear fracture, and the size and quantity of attached aluminum increase with the increase in temperature. When the testing temperature exceeds 100 °C, curled aluminum appears on the copper layer, and a large number of intermetallics are attached to the aluminum surface. This indicates that the bonding strength between intermetallics and aluminum is higher than that between intermetallics and copper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.