ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Meltblow Processing of Poly (Ethylene Furanoate)-Bio-Based Polyester Nonwovens.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly(ethylene furanoate) (PEF) has been identified as a bio-based alternative or supplement to poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) for various applications such as food packaging and bottles as well as technical- and high-performance fibers and yarns. In this study, the processing of PEF nonwovens in the meltblow process is successfully demonstrated and reported for the first time, according to our best knowledge The resulting fabrics achieved median fiber diameters of 2.04 µm, comparable to PET. The filtration efficiency of 25 g m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.