ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning in Computational Design and Optimization of Disordered Nanoporous Materials.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable Polymer Aerogels: Multiscale Design from Biomass and Thermoset Networks to AI-Guided Materials Discovery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Interpretable Machine Learning Insights into Adhesion and Modulus of Biomedical HA-Dopamine Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Integrating Graphene into Polymeric Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Review
- Fascinating Frontier, Nanoarchitectonics, as Method for Everything in Materials Science.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine Learning for Thermal Transport Prediction in Nanoporous Materials: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in Carbon-Based Aerogels for COGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review analyzes the current practices in the data-driven characterization, design and optimization of disordered nanoporous materials with pore sizes ranging from angstroms (active carbon and polymer membranes for gas separation) to tens of nm (aerogels). While the machine learning (ML)-based prediction and screening of crystalline, ordered porous materials are conducted frequently, materials with disordered porosity receive much less attention, although ML is expected to excel in the field, which is rich with ill-posed problems, non-linear correlations and a large volume of experimental results. For micro- and mesoporous solids (active carbons, mesoporous silica, aerogels, etc.), the obstacles are mostly related to the navigation of the available data with transferrable and easily interpreted features. The majority of published efforts are based on the experimental data obtained in the same work, and the datasets are often very small. Even with limited data, machine learning helps discover non-evident correlations and serves in material design and production optimization. The development of comprehensive databases for micro- and mesoporous materials with low-level structural and sorption characteristics, as well as automated synthesis/characterization protocols, is seen as the direction of efforts for the immediate future. This paper is written in a language readable by a chemist unfamiliar with the data science specifics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.