Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39942088›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Antimicrobial Activity of Probiotic Bacteria Isolated from Plants: A Review.

Anshul Sharma, Hae-Jeung Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Postbiotic approach to antibiotic resistance: antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of Lactobacillus salivarius supernatant.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The therapeutic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biocontrol Potential ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  19. The Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anshul SharmaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, College of BioNano Technology, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-4629
Hae-Jeung LeeDepartment of Food and Nutrition, College of BioNano Technology, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8353-3619

Funding

The R&D Program for Forest Science Technology, provided by the Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute) RS-2024-00404250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) constitute a heterogeneous group of bacteria isolated from fermented foods, animals, plants, and mammalian guts, with many health-promoting properties. Probiotics with antagonistic properties against human pathogens and foodborne bacteria have garnered significant attention from the scientific fraternity. A dedicated review focusing on plant-derived probiotic bacteria and their antagonistic properties has not been comprehensively reviewed. Thus, this review aimed at providing an overview of LAB isolates derived from several unconventional sources such as fruits, seeds, fruit pulp, leaves, roots, vegetables, grasses, and flowers and with their antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral properties. This paper reviewed the antimicrobial properties of different genera,

Indexed as

antibacterialantifungalbacteriocinlactic acid bacteriaorganic acidpathogens

Identifiers

PMID39942088
PMCPMC11817414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.