ReviewCancers2025
Clinical Trials of Focused Ultrasound for Brain Tumors.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Nanotechnology in Pediatric Neurology: Applications and Innovations.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Sonoselective Transfection of Glioma Endothelium.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Genomic Deletion of P-Glycoprotein from Gliomas Via the Focused Ultrasound-Delivery of a Duplex CRISPR Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein System.Cell biomaterials · 2026Article
- Review
- Magnetic Nanoparticles as a Theranostic Platform in Brain Tumor Treatment: Surmounting the Bench-to-Bedside Barriers.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-responsive nanoparticles for imaging and therapy of brain tumors.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is unclear as to where we stand with respect to utilizing emerging focused ultrasound (FUS) technology in the setting of brain tumor treatment in pediatric patients, such as malignant diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, and various adult counterparts. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to present a contemporary summary of all pertinent clinical trials to date.
methodsThe ClinicalTrials.gov database was reviewed in January 2025 for all possible clinical trials involving FUS in the management of brain tumors. These were then screened against selection criteria to identify pertinent clinical trials.
resultsA total of 30 clinical trials were identified. The majority were focused on adult patients (24/30, 80%), with the most common tumor type being glioblastoma (GBM) (14/30, 47%). There were also trials focused on pediatric patients only (5/30, 17%), as well as diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) (5/30, 17%). The most prevalent primary outcome of interest was safety (26/30, 87%). The majority of trials were active, either recruiting currently (12/30, 40%), or active but not recruiting currently (3/30, 10%). North America (22/30, 73%) was the most common location for the primary coordinating institution, and the median number of institutions per trial was one. The median expected start year for all trials was 2021, and the completion year was 2024. To date, there have been no results (interim or final) formally reported, although preliminary reports in the literature indicate this to be a safe procedure. Anecdotal trends suggest later trials target the blood-brain barrier more, involve more pediatric patients, and are more based in the United States.
conclusionThere exists a number of early-stage clinical trials investigating FUS to treat a variety of brain tumors in pediatric patients, as well as adult patients, with a significant clinical potential to improve outcomes. To date, no official results have been published, however anecdotal evidence is promising, and a number of results are expected soon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.