Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39941852›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Cone-Beam CT Segmentation for Intraoperative Electron Radiotherapy Based on U-Net Variants with Transformer and Extended LSTM Approaches.

Sara Vockner, Matthias Mattke, Ivan M Messner, Christoph Gaisberger, Franz Zehentmayr, Klarissa Ellmauer, Elvis Ruznic, Josef Karner, Gerd Fastner, Roland Reitsamer and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sara VocknerDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0009-0000-1786-1155
Matthias MattkeDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Ivan M MessnerDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Christoph GaisbergerDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Franz ZehentmayrDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5931-3907
Klarissa EllmauerDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Elvis RuznicDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7686-1008
Josef KarnerDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Gerd FastnerDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Roland ReitsamerDepartment of Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Falk RoederDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Markus StanaDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0155-0384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications are increasingly prevalent in radiotherapy, including commercial software solutions for automatic segmentation of anatomical structures for 3D Computed Tomography (CT). However, their use in intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) remains limited. In particular, no AI solution is available for contouring cone beam CT (CBCT) images acquired with a mobile CBCT device. The U-Net convolutional neural network architecture has gained huge success for medical image segmentation but still has difficulties capturing the global context. To increase the accuracy in CBCT segmentation for IOERT, three different AI architectures were trained and evaluated. The features of the natural language processing models Transformer and xLSTM were added to the popular U-Net architecture and compared with the standard U-Net and manual segmentation performance. These networks were trained and tested using 55 CBCT scans obtained from breast cancer patients undergoing IOERT in the department of radiotherapy and radiation oncology in Salzburg, and each architecture's segmentation performance was assessed using the dice coefficient (DSC) as a similarity measure. The average DSC values were 0.83 for the standard U-Net, 0.88 for the U-Net with transformer features, and 0.66 for the U-Net with xLSTM. The hybrid U-Net architecture, including Transformer features, achieved the best segmentation accuracy, demonstrating an improvement of 5% on average over the standard U-Net, while the U-Net with xLSTM showed inferior performance compared to the standard U-Net. With the help of automatic contouring, synthetic CT images can be generated, and IOERT challenges related to the time-consuming nature of 3D image-based treatment planning can be addressed.

Indexed as

automatic segmentationcone beam computed tomographydeep learningintraoperative electron radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39941852
PMCPMC11816137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.