Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39941850›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Machine Learning Methods in Clinical Flow Cytometry.

Nicholas C Spies, Alexandra Rangel, Paul English, Muir Morrison, Brendan O'Fallon, David P Ng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas C SpiesDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5873-351X
Alexandra RangelARUP Laboratories, Division of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Institute for Research and Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Paul EnglishARUP Laboratories, Division of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Institute for Research and Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8728-1225
Muir MorrisonARUP Laboratories, Division of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Institute for Research and Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Brendan O'FallonARUP Laboratories, Division of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Institute for Research and Innovation, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
David P NgDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8604-2073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review will explore the integration of machine learning (ML) techniques to enhance the analysis of increasingly complex and voluminous flow cytometry data, as traditional manual methods are insufficient for handling this data. We attempt to provide a comprehensive introduction to ML in flow cytometry, detailing the transition from manual gating to computational methods and emphasizing the importance of data quality. Key ML techniques are discussed, including supervised learning methods like logistic regression, support vector machines, and neural networks, which rely on labeled data to classify disease states. Unsupervised methods, such as k-means clustering, FlowSOM, UMAP, and t-SNE, are highlighted for their ability to identify novel cell populations without predefined labels. We also delve into newer semi-supervised and weakly supervised methods, which leverage partial labeling to improve model performance. Practical aspects of implementing ML in clinical settings are addressed, including regulatory considerations, data preprocessing, model training, validation, and the importance of generalizability, and we underscore the collaborative effort required among pathologists, data scientists, and laboratory professionals to ensure robust model development and deployment. Finally, we show the transformative potential of ML in flow cytometry in uncovering new biological insights through advanced computational techniques.

Indexed as

acute leukemiaclinical flow cytometrymachine learningoperational efficiency

Identifiers

PMID39941850
PMCPMC11816335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.