Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39941829›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Immune Resistance in Glioblastoma: Understanding the Barriers to ICI and CAR-T Cell Therapy.

Thomas Eckert, M S Zobaer, Jessie Boulos, Angela Alexander-Bryant, Tiffany G Baker, Charlotte Rivers, Arabinda Das, William A Vandergrift, Jaime Martinez, Alicia Zukas and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Thomas EckertSchool of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29209, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-2994-2199
M S ZobaerMUSC Institute for Neuroscience Discovery (MIND), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Jessie BoulosDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-3266
Angela Alexander-BryantDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Tiffany G BakerMUSC Institute for Neuroscience Discovery (MIND), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-7110
Charlotte RiversDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Arabinda DasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
William A VandergriftDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6099-3118
Jaime MartinezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Alicia ZukasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Scott M LindhorstDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1585-4450
Sunil PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Ben StricklandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Nathan C RowlandMUSC Institute for Neuroscience Discovery (MIND), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor, with fewer than 5% of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), followed by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, marked major advancements in oncology. Despite demonstrating efficacy in other blood and solid cancers, these therapies have yielded limited success in clinical trials for both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. A deeper understanding of GBM's resistance to immunotherapy is essential for enhancing treatment responses and translating results seen in other cancer models.

objectivesIn this review, we examine clinical trial outcomes involving ICIs and CAR-T for GBM patients and explore the evasive mechanisms of GBM and the tumor microenvironment. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: Multiple clinical trials investigating ICIs in GBM have shown poor outcomes, with no significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Results from smaller case studies with CAR-T therapy have warranted further investigation. However, no large-scale trials or robust studies have yet established these immunotherapeutic approaches as definitive treatment strategies. Future research should shift focus from addressing the scarcity of functional T cells to exploiting the abundant myeloid-derived cells within the tumor microenvironment.

conclusionsTranslating these therapies into effective treatments for glioblastoma in humans remains a significant challenge. The highly immunosuppressive nature of GBM and its tumor microenvironment continue to hinder the success of these innovative immunotherapeutic approaches. Targeting the myeloid-derived compartment may lead to more robust and sustained immune responses.

Indexed as

glioblastomaimmune microenvironmentneuroimmunologyT cells

Identifiers

PMID39941829
PMCPMC11816167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.