ArticleCancers2025
A Deep Learning Approach for the Classification of Fibroglandular Breast Density in Histology Images of Human Breast Tissue.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Normal breast tissue (NBT)-classifiers: advancing compartment classification in normal breast histology.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo progress research into the biological mechanisms that link mammographic breast density to breast cancer risk, fibroglandular breast density can be used as a surrogate measure. This study aimed to develop a computational tool to classify fibroglandular breast density in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained breast tissue sections using deep learning approaches that would assist future mammographic density research.
methodsFour different architectural configurations of transferred MobileNet-v2 convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and four different models of vision transformers were developed and trained on a database of H&E-stained normal human breast tissue sections (965 tissue blocks from 93 patients) that had been manually classified into one of five fibroglandular density classes, with class 1 being very low fibroglandular density and class 5 being very high fibroglandular density.
resultsThe MobileNet-Arc 1 and ViT model 1 achieved the highest overall F1 scores of 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Both models exhibited the lowest false positive rate and highest true positive rate in class 5, while the most challenging classification was class 3, where images from classes 2 and 4 were mistakenly classified as class 3. The area under the curves (AUCs) for all classes were higher than 0.98.
conclusionsBoth the ViT and MobileNet models showed promising performance in the accurate classification of H&E-stained tissue sections across all five fibroglandular density classes, providing a rapid and easy-to-use computational tool for breast density analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.