ArticleCancers2025
The Use of an Integrated Digital Tool to Improve the Efficiency of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards-A Prospective Trial in Taiwan.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven smart patient retrieval for precision oncology.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Multidisciplinary Oncology Decision-Making: A Systematic Review of LLM Concordance with MDT Recommendations and Implications for Clinical Reasoning Education.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Digital tumour board solution enhances case preparation time and reduces postponements: an implementer report.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Observational
- Multidisciplinary Team (MDT)-Based Approaches for Liver Cancer Treatment: A Discussion Paper on Tumor Boards and Beyond.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Implementing an electronic health record system in a tertiary care surgical oncology setup - A mixed method analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study assessed the impact of the navify Tumor Board digital tool on multidisciplinary team tumor boards' (MDTs) efficiency, comparing its streamlined workflow and preparation to conventional, time-consuming methods.
methodsThis prospective observational study (January-June 2021) compared MDT phase durations (preparation, discussion, follow-up) using the navify Tumor Board platform versus conventional methods for integrated patient data management and decision-making.
resultsThe navify Tumor Board significantly improved MDT efficiency across all phases compared to conventional methods. In the preparation phase, it reduced the time needed for cancer staging imaging checks and sending meeting materials by 8.62% (
conclusionsThis study showed that the navify Tumor Board tool can significantly improve the efficiency of MDT workflows in Taiwan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.