ReviewCancers2025
The Applications of Machine Learning in the Management of Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation: Are We Ready?
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Toward Better Response Assessment of Cutaneous Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Report from the National Institutes of Health Consensus Project Task Force.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Guideline
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Review
- Addressing the translation gap in SCT donor selection.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Personalized Stem Cell-Based Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: An Avenue of Opportunities? A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Editorial: Improving stem cell transplantation delivery using computational modelling.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a life-saving therapy for hematologic malignancies, such as leukemia and lymphoma and other severe conditions but is associated with significant risks, including graft versus host disease (GVHD), relapse, and treatment-related mortality. The increasing complexity of clinical, genomic, and biomarker data has spurred interest in machine learning (ML), which has emerged as a transformative tool to enhance decision-making and optimize outcomes in HSCT. This review examines the applications of ML in HSCT, focusing on donor selection, conditioning regimen, and prediction of post-transplant outcomes. Machine learning approaches, including decision trees, random forests, and neural networks, have demonstrated potential in improving donor compatibility algorithms, mortality and relapse prediction, and GVHD risk stratification. Integrating "omics" data with ML models has enabled the identification of novel biomarkers and the development of highly accurate predictive tools, supporting personalized treatment strategies. Despite promising advancements, challenges persist, including data standardization, algorithm interpretability, and ethical considerations regarding patient privacy. While ML holds promise for revolutionizing HSCT management, addressing these barriers through multicenter collaborations and regulatory frameworks remains essential for broader clinical adoption. In addition, the potential of ML can cope with some challenges such as data harmonization, patients' data protection, and availability of adequate infrastructure. Future research should prioritize larger datasets, multimodal data integration, and robust validation methods to fully realize ML's transformative potential in HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.