ReviewCancers2025
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessments in Research on Patients with Adult Rare Solid Cancers: A State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of life and care experiences in a US multi-institutional neuroendocrine tumor cohort.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Quality of Life and Healthcare Experiences of Patients with Anal Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- European Reference Networks - a flagship activity of the EU in the field of rare and complex diseases: from 2017 to 2025.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- Discrepancies in the country versions of the WHOQOL-BREF as a potential source of error in assessing quality of life and a barrier to comparative research.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important patient-reported outcome for all cancer patients, including adult patients with rare solid cancers. However, current knowledge of HRQoL in this population is limited, which hinders the delivery of personalized care. This review aimed to explore the heterogeneity of HRQoL among adult patients with a solid rare cancer across the ten European Reference Network for Rare Adult Solid Cancers (EURACAN) domains and to summarize the HRQoL measures used in clinical research.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted to identify all clinical studies assessing HRQoL in adult patients with a solid rare cancer. Four databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science/Scopus) were searched (February 2023).
resultsThe search yielded 18,704 articles, of which 1416 articles were fully screened and 463 were eligible for analysis. Of these, 397 studies used generic tools to assess HRQoL, while 270 used tumor-specific instruments. Three EURACAN domains (sarcoma, endocrine tumors, and thoracic tumors) primarily assessed HRQoL using generic questionnaires. Additionally, the rare gynecological tumor, rare male genitourinary, and sarcoma EURACAN domains lacked specific HRQoL measures. Brain, head and neck, and uveal melanoma EURACAN domains used tumor- or domain-specific questionnaires in more than half of the studies.
conclusionsThis state-of-the-art literature review shows that HRQoL assessment is gradually becoming more prevalent in adult solid rare cancer research. A combination of generic, tumor-specific, and domain-specific questionnaires across various rare cancer domains has proven effective in capturing a broad range of HRQoL issues. However, many EURACAN domains still lack specific strategies for assessing HRQoL, which limits the ability to fully understand and address patients' experiences. Future research should prioritize developing comprehensive and robust HRQoL measurement strategies and tools to enable meaningful clinical research and to ensure that the patient voice is incorporated in their clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.