ArticleCancers2025
Multikinase Treatment of Glioblastoma: Evaluating the Rationale for Regorafenib.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathway dysregulation and therapeutic resistance in glioblastoma: molecular mechanisms and emerging therapeutic targets.Future science OA · 2026Review
- The Evolving Role of Second- and Third-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Advances in Targeted Therapy with Sunitinib, Regorafenib, and Avapritinib.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Current Research Trends in Glioblastoma: Focus on Receptor Tyrosine Kinases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We explored the rationale for treating glioblastoma (GBM) with regorafenib. In 103 newly diagnosed GBM patients, we assessed mutations, copy number variants (CNVs), fusions, and overexpression in 46 genes encoding protein kinases (PKs) potentially targeted by regorafenib or its metabolites and performed a functional enrichment analysis to assess their implications in angiogenesis. We analyzed regorafenib's binding inhibitory activity and target affinity for these 46 PKs and focused on a subset of 18 genes inhibited by regorafenib at clinically achievable concentrations and on 19 genes involved in angiogenesis. Putative oncogenic alterations were defined as oncogenic/likely oncogenic mutations, oncogenic fusions, CNVs > 5, and/or gene overexpression. Regorafenib did not target all 46 PKs. For the 46-gene set, 40 genes (86.9%) and 73 patients (70.8%) harbored at least one alteration in genes encoding targetable PKs, but putative oncogenic alterations were present in only 34 patients (33%). In the 18-gene set, 18 genes (100%) and 48 patients (46.6%) harbored alterations, but putative oncogenic alterations were detected in only 26 patients (25.2%). Thirty patients (29.1%) had oncogenic alterations in the 18-gene set and/or in angiogenesis-related genes. Around 33% of patients had oncogenic alterations in any of the 46 potential targets. Additionally, the suboptimal dosing of regorafenib, due to its poor penetration of the blood-brain barrier, may reduce the likelihood of effectively targeting certain PKs. Future use of multi-target drugs must be guided by a thorough understanding of target presence, effective inhibition, and the drug's ability to reach brain tumors at adequate concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.