Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39941589›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Saurab Karki, Pallavi Lakra, Kaushik Kumar, Shiavax J Rao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saurab KarkiInternal Medicine, MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center, Baltimore, MD 21237, USA.
Pallavi LakraInternal Medicine, Hartford HealthCare Medical Group, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA.
Kaushik KumarPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8609-4316
Shiavax J RaoCardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-2089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients with heart failure exhibit ventricular dyssynchrony, which is addressed by cardiac resynchronization therapy, traditionally through the use of biventricular pacing (BVP) devices. Despite this, around 30% of patients do not achieve the desired clinical outcome, and echocardiographic findings show that some patients deteriorate even further. Conduction system pacing (CSP) is a more physiologic pacing technique and includes his-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). In this review, we further discuss and compare various CSP techniques for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. After analyzing the current state of the literature on this topic until 2023, eight studies were included in this review and consisted of two trials and five observational studies with a total of 2841 patients. Both BVP and CSP resulted in improved outcomes in terms of NYHA class, QRS duration, and left ventricular ejection fraction over time. These effects were more pronounced in patients undergoing CSP, as the technique is more physiological and results in the synchronized activation of the ventricles. LBBAP yielded better outcomes compared to BVP and resulted in fewer heart failure hospitalizations and a lower all-cause mortality rate.

Indexed as

biventricular pacingcardiac resynchronization therapyconduction system pacingheart failure with reduced ejection fractionhis-bundle pacingleft bundle branch area pacing

Identifiers

PMID39941589
PMCPMC11818343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.