ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Pre-Clinical and Clinical Advances in Gene Therapy of X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa: Hope on the Horizon.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of AAV RPGR gene therapy in X-linked retinitis pigmentosa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Gene Therapy for RPGR Gene-Associated X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Pooled it
- Patterns of X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Genetic Testing in England and Implications for Service Provision.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Base and Prime Editing for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Delivery Platforms, Safety, Efficacy, and Translational Perspectives.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Applications of Modern Cell Therapies: The Latest Data in Ophthalmology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Genetic Therapies for Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Breakthroughs and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- State of the Art on Inherited Retinal Dystrophies: Management and Molecular Genetics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) is a severe inherited retinal degenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium, leading to blindness. Predominantly affecting males due to mutations in the RPGR gene, XLRP currently lacks effective treatments beyond supportive care. Gene therapy has emerged as a promising approach to restore photoreceptor function by delivering functional copies of the RPGR gene. Recent clinical trials using AAV vectors, such as AAV5-RPGR and AGTC-501, have demonstrated encouraging results, including improvements in retinal sensitivity and visual function. While early successes like LUXTURNA have set the precedent for gene therapy in retinal diseases, adapting these strategies to XLRP presents unique challenges due to the complexity of RPGR mutations and the need for efficient photoreceptor targeting. Advances in vector design, including the use of optimized AAV serotypes with enhanced tropism for photoreceptors and specific promoters, have significantly improved gene delivery. Despite setbacks in some studies, ongoing research and clinical trials continue to refine these therapies, offering hope for patients affected by XLRP. This review explores the etiology and pathophysiology of XLRP, evaluates current treatment challenges, highlights recent clinical advances in gene therapy, and discusses future perspectives for bringing these therapies into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.