Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39941547›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

Performance of ChatGPT in Pediatric Audiology as Rated by Students and Experts.

Anna Ratuszniak, Elzbieta Gos, Artur Lorens, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Henryk Skarzynski, W Wiktor Jedrzejczak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An expert-based assessment of the quality, reliability, understandability, and readability of ChatGPT responses on cerebral palsy.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Diagnostic interpretation of pure tone audiograms by multimodal LLMs: A comparative study of ChatGPT-5.0 and Gemini 2.5.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna RatuszniakInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Street, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-0460
Elzbieta GosInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Street, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.
Artur LorensInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Street, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8618-7651
Piotr Henryk SkarzynskiInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Street, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-1915
Henryk SkarzynskiInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Street, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7141-9851
W Wiktor JedrzejczakInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10 Street, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8404-0672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceaudiologyChatGPThealth information-seeking behaviorlarge language models in medicineotorhinolaryngology

Identifiers

PMID39941547
PMCPMC11818674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.