ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) in Bicuspid Anatomy.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Potential Predictors of Aortic Stenosis Severity Using ECG-Gated Multidetector CT in Patients with Bicuspid and Tricuspid Aortic Valves Prior to TAVI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Young Patients: Challenges and Perspectives-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The TAVI Dilemma: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve-Interpreting Current Evidence for Personalized Valve Selection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis, a common congenital condition, presents unique challenges for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) due to anatomical variations like cusp morphology, coexisting aortopathy and calcification. TAVI offers a viable option for BAV patients with refinements in technique and technology, though ongoing research is essential to optimize patient-specific approaches and long-term results. Key considerations for TAVI in BAV include precise valve sizing, positioning, and the need for rigorous pre-procedural imaging to mitigate risks such as paravalvular leak and stroke. Early results show TAVI's safety and efficacy are comparable to surgery, though BAV patients undergoing TAVI often are exposed to higher rates of post-procedural pacemaker implantation. Emerging data on next-generation self-expandable (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) valves reveal that while both offer success in this complex anatomical aortic valve variation, gaps remain in the long-term durability and management of BAV-related aortopathy. This review examines the latest advancements in TAVI for BAV, emphasizing how specialized approaches and device selection address BAV's complexities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.