Evaluation of NAPLES Prognostic Score to Predict Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Short- and long-term risk stratification in acutely ill medical patients by implementing D-dimer in the emergency setting - A prospective cohort study.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
   Article
2. Prognostic nutritional index, Naples prognostic score and Osaka prognostic score as predictors of acute respiratory distress syndrome in non-diabetes mellitus patients with sepsis: a loss of predictive efficacy of NPS and OPS in diabetes mellitus cohorts.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026
   Article
3. A narrative review of neuroprotective effects of albumin: The underlying mechanisms and therapeutic prospects in ischemic stroke.Brain circulation
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as