ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Importance of MRI in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiological shifts and advances in research on early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis (AIFR) is a rare, severe, and life-threatening opportunistic infection associated with high mortality and morbidity. Rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for survival and effective disease management. Diagnosing AIFR is challenging because no single pathognomonic feature exists other than surgical biopsy showing fungal angioinvasion and necrosis. This narrative review focuses on the diagnostic challenges and pitfalls, emphasizing the critical clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early diagnosis of AIFR. It includes selected cases that illustrate the significance of MRI. When AIFR is suspected, clinical symptoms, nasal endoscopy, blood samples, and facial computed tomography all provide non-specific information. In contrast, MRI can identify signs of devitalized sinonasal mucosa consistent with AIFR. The absence of mucosal enhancement on T1-weighted images, combined with restricted diffusivity, are characteristic MRI features of AIFR. The cases presented underscore the usefulness of MRI in supporting clinical suspicion of AIFR and accurately determining its topography, thereby guiding early surgical biopsies and debridement. In suspected cases of AIFR, MRI serves as a valuable supplementary, non-invasive tool to help determine whether prompt surgical biopsy or debridement is necessary, thereby enhancing early diagnosis and improving survival rates. Therefore, the threshold for conducting an MRI in these cases should be low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.