Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39941212›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Radiology-Current Status and Critical Review.

Rafał Obuchowicz, Julia Lasek, Marek Wodziński, Adam Piórkowski, Michał Strzelecki, Karolina Nurzynska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence in Rhinology: A State-of-the-Art Review of Clinical Readiness and Implementation Pathways.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rafał ObuchowiczDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5883-5551
Julia LasekFaculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-1823
Marek WodzińskiDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-6246
Adam PiórkowskiDepartment of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4773-5322
Michał StrzeleckiInstitute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, 93-590 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9102-4929
Karolina NurzynskaDepartment of Algorithmics and Software, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5137-5732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humanity stands at a pivotal moment of technological revolution, with artificial intelligence (AI) reshaping fields traditionally reliant on human cognitive abilities. This transition, driven by advancements in artificial neural networks, has transformed data processing and evaluation, creating opportunities for addressing complex and time-consuming tasks with AI solutions. Convolutional networks (CNNs) and the adoption of GPU technology have already revolutionized image recognition by enhancing computational efficiency and accuracy. In radiology, AI applications are particularly valuable for tasks involving pattern detection and classification; for example, AI tools have enhanced diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in detecting abnormalities across imaging modalities through automated feature extraction. Our analysis reveals that neuroimaging and chest imaging, as well as CT and MRI modalities, are the primary focus areas for AI products, reflecting their high clinical demand and complexity. AI tools are also used to target high-prevalence diseases, such as lung cancer, stroke, and breast cancer, underscoring AI's alignment with impactful diagnostic needs. The regulatory landscape is a critical factor in AI product development, with the majority of products certified under the Medical Device Directive (MDD) and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) in Class IIa or Class I categories, indicating compliance with moderate-risk standards. A rapid increase in AI product development from 2017 to 2020, peaking in 2020 and followed by recent stabilization and saturation, was identified. In this work, the authors review the advancements in AI-based imaging applications, underscoring AI's transformative potential for enhanced diagnostic support and focusing on the critical role of CNNs, regulatory challenges, and potential threats to human labor in the field of diagnostic imaging.

Indexed as

AI applicationsartificial intelligencejob threatradiologyregulatory systems

Identifiers

PMID39941212
PMCPMC11816879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.