ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bone Age Assessment Using Various Medical Imaging Techniques Enhanced by Artificial Intelligence.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone as a Biomarker of Ageing and Senescence: Connecting Musculoskeletal Health to Longevity via Diet, Nutrition and Exercise.Biology · 2026Review
- AI-driven differentiation of 2D proximal femur morphometry and hounsfield units for integrated forensic estimation of sex, stature, and age in a modern Thai dry bone sample.Anatomical science international · 2026Article
- Current State and Future Directions of Diagnostic Imaging and Interpretation in Pediatric Radiology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A novel method based on ultrasound radiomics for predicting attainment of near-adult height in adolescents.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Automated Bone Age Assessment and Adult Height Prediction from Pediatric Hand Radiographs via a Cascaded Deep Learning Framework.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Sex Estimation from Whole-Foot X-Rays: Benchmarking CNNs for Rapid Forensic Identification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Growth Prediction in Orthodontics: ASystematic Review of Past Methods up to Artificial Intelligence.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Correlation Between Dental Age, Chronological Age, and Cervical Vertebral Maturation in Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study in a Romanian Population Group.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone age (BA) reflects skeletal maturity and is crucial in clinical and forensic contexts, particularly for growth assessment, adult height prediction, and managing conditions like short stature and precocious puberty, often using X-ray, MRI, CT, or ultrasound imaging. Traditional BA assessment methods, including the Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse techniques, compare morphological changes to reference atlases. Despite their effectiveness, factors like genetics and environment complicate evaluations, emphasizing the need for new methods that account for comprehensive variations in skeletal maturity. The limitations of classical BA assessment methods increase the demand for automated solutions. The first automated tool, HANDX, was introduced in 1989. Researchers now focus on developing reliable artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tools, utilizing machine learning and deep learning techniques to improve accuracy and efficiency in BA evaluations, addressing traditional methods' shortcomings. Recent reviews on BA assessment methods rarely compare AI-based approaches across imaging technologies. This article explores advancements in BA estimation, focusing on machine learning methods and their clinical implications while providing a historical context and highlighting each approach's benefits and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.