Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39941187›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Bone Age Assessment Using Various Medical Imaging Techniques Enhanced by Artificial Intelligence.

Wenhao Yuan, Pei Fan, Le Zhang, Wenbiao Pan, Liwei Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenhao YuanInformation Technology Center, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Pei FanDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
Le ZhangInformation Technology Center, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Wenbiao PanInformation Technology Center, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Liwei ZhangState-Owned Assets and Laboratory Management Office, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.

Funding

the Science and Technology Bureau Project of Wenzhou G20220003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone age (BA) reflects skeletal maturity and is crucial in clinical and forensic contexts, particularly for growth assessment, adult height prediction, and managing conditions like short stature and precocious puberty, often using X-ray, MRI, CT, or ultrasound imaging. Traditional BA assessment methods, including the Greulich-Pyle and Tanner-Whitehouse techniques, compare morphological changes to reference atlases. Despite their effectiveness, factors like genetics and environment complicate evaluations, emphasizing the need for new methods that account for comprehensive variations in skeletal maturity. The limitations of classical BA assessment methods increase the demand for automated solutions. The first automated tool, HANDX, was introduced in 1989. Researchers now focus on developing reliable artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tools, utilizing machine learning and deep learning techniques to improve accuracy and efficiency in BA evaluations, addressing traditional methods' shortcomings. Recent reviews on BA assessment methods rarely compare AI-based approaches across imaging technologies. This article explores advancements in BA estimation, focusing on machine learning methods and their clinical implications while providing a historical context and highlighting each approach's benefits and limitations.

Indexed as

AIbone age assessmentCTMRIultrasound imagingX-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID39941187
PMCPMC11817689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.