ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancements in Hysteroscopic Diagnosis and Management of Endometritis.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predictors of Procedural Pain in Office Hysteroscopy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Observational
- Micropolyps, Plasma Cells, and Pregnancy: Reevaluating Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies in Chronic Endometritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic endometritis: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infertility remains a complex clinical challenge, with intrauterine pathologies contributing to a significant percentage of in vitro fertilization (IVF) failures. Chronic endometritis (CE) has gained attention due to its potential association with unexplained infertility and recurrent miscarriage. This review explores the role of hysteroscopy in diagnosing and treating CE. The endometrium undergoes dynamic changes orchestrated by ovarian steroids, and disturbances may lead to CE, characterized by plasma cell infiltration. Diagnosis traditionally relies on histopathologic examination, but hysteroscopy offers real-time imaging, revealing the specific macroscopic alterations associated with CE. However, diagnostic accuracy varies, prompting the need for standardized criteria. CE has been linked to poor reproductive outcomes, emphasizing the importance of effective treatment. Antibiotic therapy is a common approach, with doxycycline as the first-line regimen. Hysteroscopic polypectomy, targeting non-infectious CE, emerges as a promising treatment, demonstrating fertility benefits. The review underscores the significance of hysteroscopy in diagnosing and treating CE, providing insights into its impact on reproductive outcomes in infertile women. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and establish unified diagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.