ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Evaluating the Performance of Peak Calling Algorithms Available for Intracellular G-Quadruplex Sequencing.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Reproducibility and Best Practices for Replicate Design in G-Quadruplex ChIP-Seq Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA G-quadruplexes (G4) are non-canonical DNA structures that play key roles in various biological processes. Antibody-dependent sequencing is an important tool for identifying intracellularly formed DNA G4s, and peak calling is a crucial step in processing the sequencing data. As the applicability of existing peak calling algorithms to intracellular G4 data has not been previously assessed, we systematically compared and evaluated these algorithms to determine those best suited for G4 detection. We selected seven representative candidates from 43 published peak calling algorithms for detailed evaluation. The performance of each candidate on six published intracellular G4 sequencing datasets (GSE107690, GSE145090, GSE133379, GSE178668ChIP-seq, GSE178668CUT&Tag, GSE221437) were assessed by precision and recall against customized benchmarks integrating results from multiple algorithms, as well as consistency with known G4 information (pG4 predicted by pqsfinder, oG4 from GSE63874, and multi-cell-line conserved G4s) and epigenetic signals. We identified MACS2, PeakRanger, and GoPeaks as the most effective algorithms for analyzing intracellular G4 sequencing data, and attributed their superior performance partially to the distribution model of sequencing reads/fragments used in the hypothesis testing step of the peak calling procedures. These findings provide guidance and rationale for selecting peak callers appropriate for intracellular G4 data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.