Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39940983›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Chitosan-Based Materials for Peripheral Nerve Repair-New Pre-Clinical Data on Degradation Behavior at the Nerve Repair Site and Critical Opinion on Their Translational Impact.

Giulia Ronchi, Christina Ackva, Federica Fregnan, Federica Zen, Luisa Muratori, Alessandro Crosio, Jennifer Metzen, Kirsten Haastert-Talini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Special Issue "Plasticity of the Nervous System After Injury: 2nd Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giulia RonchiDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences & Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Christina AckvaKeriMedical, Route des Acacias, 45a, 1227 Genf, Switzerland.
Federica FregnanDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences & Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Federica ZenDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences & Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-5419
Luisa MuratoriDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences & Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (NICO), University of Torino, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4881-3313
Alessandro CrosioUOC Traumatology-Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, CTO Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Jennifer MetzenInstitute of Neuroanatomy and Cell Biology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Kirsten Haastert-TaliniInstitute of Neuroanatomy and Cell Biology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2502-8969

Funding

Kerimedical Suisse RDV-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before clinical approval of chitosan nerve conduits (CNCs) less than 10 years ago, substantial material degradation was not reported from pre-clinical research. The current study investigated the biodegradation of two different CNC variants in the median nerve model. In adult rats, 10 mm long CNCs were secured covering end-to-end repair sites. After 2, 6, 12, and 18 months, the implantation sites were inspected, and samples harvested. Histology was performed in order to analyze local immune response or foreign body tissue reaction around the devices or within nerve samples. Further, the number of myelinated nerve fibers and the condition of the chitosan material was evaluated. Data confirmed that different CNC variants did not induce tissue reaction or negatively impact the condition of the regenerated nerve. At late time points, some specific variants were demonstrated to have resulted in encapsulated material debris in the vicinity of the original implantation side. The reported degradation behavior resembles recent clinical reports and indicates that implantation sites for CNCs need to be chosen carefully. Nerve regeneration itself is undisturbed, but narrow implantation sites should be avoided for eliminating the risk of foreign body sensation with immunologically inert material degradation.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsChitosanMedian NerveNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPeripheral NervesAnimalsMaleRatsBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanchitosan nerve guidedegradation in vivonerve regeneration

Identifiers

PMID39940983
PMCPMC11818691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.