ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Deaminase-Driven Reverse Transcription Mutagenesis in Oncogenesis: Critical Analysis of Transcriptional Strand Asymmetries of Single Base Substitution Signatures.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic-Genetic Coupling and Understanding the Molecular and Cellular Basis of Lamarckian Inheritance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Association of APOBEC mutagenesis with stromal and endothelial niche remodeling and PCDH9-linked signaling alterations in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Deaminase Modulation Driving a New Era in Drug Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper provides a critical analysis of the molecular mechanisms presently used to explain transcriptional strand asymmetries of single base substitution (SBS) signatures observed in cancer genomes curated at the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database (Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute). The analysis is based on a deaminase-driven reverse transcriptase (DRT) mutagenesis model of cancer oncogenesis involving both the cytosine (AID/APOBEC) and adenosine (ADAR) mutagenic deaminases. In this analysis we apply what is known, or can reasonably be inferred, of the immunoglobulin somatic hypermutation (Ig SHM) mechanism to the analysis of the transcriptional stand asymmetries of the COSMIC SBS signatures that are observed in cancer genomes. The underlying assumption is that somatic mutations arising in cancer genomes are driven by dysregulated off-target Ig SHM-like mutagenic processes at non-Ig loci. It is reasoned that most SBS signatures whether of "unknown etiology" or assigned-molecular causation, can be readily understood in terms of the DRT-paradigm. These include the major age-related "clock-like" SBS5 signature observed in all cancer genomes sequenced and many other common subset signatures including SBS1, SBS3, SBS2/13, SBS6, SBS12, SBS16, SBS17a/17b, SBS19, SBS21, as well as signatures clearly arising from exogenous causation. We conclude that the DRT-model provides a plausible molecular framework that augments our current understanding of immunogenetic mechanisms driving oncogenesis. It accommodates both what is known about AID/APOBEC and ADAR somatic mutation strand asymmetries and provides a fully integrated understanding into the molecular origins of common COSMIC SBS signatures. The DRT-paradigm thus provides scientists and clinicians with additional molecular insights into the causal links between deaminase-associated genomic signatures and oncogenic processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.