ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
A Practical Guide to Computational Tools for Engineering Biocatalytic Properties.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electrostatic potential as a reactivity scoring function in computer-assisted enzyme engineering.The FEBS journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for efficient, selective, and stable enzymes has fueled advancements in computational enzyme engineering, a field that complements experimental methods to accelerate enzyme discovery. With a plethora of software and tools available, researchers from different disciplines often face challenges in selecting the most suitable method that meets their requirements and available starting data. This review categorizes the computational tools available for enzyme engineering based on their capacity to enhance the following specific biocatalytic properties of biotechnological interest: (i) protein-ligand affinity/selectivity, (ii) catalytic efficiency, (iii) thermostability, and (iv) solubility for recombinant enzyme production. By aligning tools with their respective scoring functions, we aim to guide researchers, particularly those new to computational methods, in selecting the appropriate software for the design of protein engineering campaigns. De novo enzyme design, involving the creation of novel proteins, is beyond this review's scope. Instead, we focus on practical strategies for fine-tuning enzymatic performance within an established reference framework of natural proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.