Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39940732›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Comprehensive Evaluation of Multi-Omics Clustering Algorithms for Cancer Molecular Subtyping.

Juan Wang, Lingxiao Wang, Yi Liu, Xiao Li, Jie Ma, Mansheng Li, Yunping Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multivariate Random Forests for Cross-Modal Multi-Omics Integration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Self-Normalizing Multi-Omics Neural Network for Pan-Cancer Prognostication.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan WangSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China.
Lingxiao WangState Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-2665
Yi LiuState Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Xiao LiState Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Jie MaState Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Mansheng LiState Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Yunping ZhuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China.

Funding

National Key Research Program of China 2021YFA1301603National Natural Science Foundation of China 82341079Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics (Academy of Military Medical Sciences) SKLP-O202204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a highly heterogeneous and complex disease, the identification of cancer's molecular subtypes is crucial for accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment. The integration of multi-omics data enables a comprehensive interpretation of the molecular characteristics of cancer at various biological levels. In recent years, an increasing number of multi-omics clustering algorithms for cancer molecular subtyping have been proposed. However, the absence of a definitive gold standard makes it challenging to evaluate and compare these methods effectively. In this study, we developed a general framework for the comprehensive evaluation of multi-omics clustering algorithms and introduced an innovative metric, the accuracy-weighted average index, which simultaneously considers both clustering performance and clinical relevance. Using this framework, we performed a thorough evaluation and comparison of 11 state-of-the-art multi-omics clustering algorithms, including deep learning-based methods. By integrating the accuracy-weighted average index with computational efficiency, our analysis reveals that PIntMF demonstrates the best overall performance, making it a promising tool for molecular subtyping across a wide range of cancers.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenomicsNeoplasmsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansMultiomicsaccuracy-weighted average indexcancer subtypingclustering algorithmmulti-omics

Identifiers

PMID39940732
PMCPMC11816650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.