ArticlePolymers2025
Geometric Accuracy and Dimensional Precision in 3D Printing-Based Gear Manufacturing: A Study on Interchangeability and Forming Precision.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Process Parameter Optimization and Straightness Error Prediction in FDM Based on PB-CCF Design.Polymers · 2026Article
- A multicentre audit of the geometric accuracy and water equivalence of 3D printed thermoplastic objects for use in radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Analysis of Surface Topography, Dimensional and Geometric Deviations, and Biocidal Properties of 3D Prints Made of Thermoplastic-Based Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing FDM Rapid Prototyping for Industry 4.0 Applications Through Simulation and Optimization Techniques.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates the geometric interchangeability and dimensional precision of parts fabricated using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), with a focus on gear manufacturing. By employing a substrate and two spur gears as test components, critical process parameters, including layer thickness, extrusion speed, and print temperature, were optimized to achieve enhanced accuracy. Geometric and dimensional tolerances such as straightness, roundness, and surface roughness were systematically evaluated using advanced metrological techniques. The results indicate that larger components demonstrate higher precision, with deviations for large and pinion gears ranging between -0.045 and 0.060 mm, and -0.150 and 0.078 mm, respectively. Analysis reveals that the anisotropic nature of the FDM process and thermal shrinkage significantly impact accuracy, particularly in smaller features. Residual stress analysis reveals that smaller components formed via FDM exhibit higher stress concentrations and dimensional deviations due to voids and uneven thermal contraction, whereas larger components and flat substrates achieve better stress distribution and precision. The findings suggest that reducing material shrinkage coefficients and optimizing process parameters can enhance part quality, achieving dimensional tolerances within ±0.1 mm and geometric consistency suitable for practical applications. This research highlights the potential of FDM for precision manufacturing and provides insights into improving its performance for high-demand industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.