ArticlePolymers2025
An In-Vitro Evaluation of Strength, Hardness, and Color Stability of Heat-Polymerized and 3D-Printed Denture Base Polymers After Aging.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and microbial study of reinforced 3D-printed maxillary denture base resin: a randomized trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Mechanical Anisotropy and Fatigue Behavior of 3D-Printed Dentures: A Comparison with CAD/CAM Milled Bases After Thermomechanical Aging.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Mechanical, biological, optical, and clinical properties of 3d-printed denture base resins: a comprehensive narrative review.Odontology · 2026Review
- Physicochemical and mechanical comparison of denture base materials after artificial aging.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- In Vitro Mechanical Evaluation of Prosthodontic Dental Acrylics Fabricated by Conventional and Additive Techniques.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Finite element analysis of stress in removable lower complete denture under vertical and oblique occlusal forces.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Additive manufacturing for Dentistry: A comprehensive review of techniques and applications.Progress in materials science · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect of prolonged brushing with different agents on surface characteristics of conventional and 3D-printed denture resins.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The influence of denture adhesives on the microhardness, color, and roughness of rigid reliners, before and after thermocycling.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of incorporating calcium carbonate nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed acrylic resin.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the strength, hardness, and color stability of 3D-printed denture base resins and compared the outcome with conventional heat-cured denture base resins after aging by thermocycling. A total of 72 specimens from conventional and 3D-printed materials were fabricated in different shapes and dimensions based on the mechanical and color tests performed. The specimens were divided into five groups: flexural, tensile, and compressive strengths (n = 20), hardness, and color stability (n = 6). In all these groups, half of the specimens were stored in a distilled water bath at 37 °C for 24 h, and the remaining half of the specimens were subjected to aging by thermocycling. The 3D-printed specimens demonstrated the highest means of tensile strength (32.20 ± 3.8 MPa), compressive strength (106.31 ± 4.07 MPa), and Vickers hardness number (24.51 ± 0.36), and the lowest means of flexural strength (54.29 ± 13.17 MPa) and color difference (ΔE = 2.18 ± 1.09). Conventional heat-cured specimens demonstrated the highest means of flexural strength (59.96 ± 8.39 MPa) and color difference (ΔE = 4.74 ± 2.37) and the lowest means of tensile strength (32.17 ± 9.06 MPa), compressive strength (46.05 ± 4.98 MPa), and Vickers hardness number (10.42 ± 1.05). Aging significantly reduced the flexural strength (-27%), tensile strength (-44%), and hardness (-7%) of 3D-printed resins in contrast to the conventional resin's compressive strength (-15%) and color stability (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.